Will You Read Stylist? Or Stick to Shortlist?

By Cate Sevilla

Every Thursday the women across the UK all have a dirty little secret. Well, it’s not actually a secret, and it’s probably not dirty, but it feels like we’re breaking the rules nonetheless.

So what is it that we’re doing?

Reading Shortlist – the free men's mag that is distributed throughout London and other cities in the UK every Thursday morning, much to the delight of most of the people bustling throughout this breezy, drizzly country.

Shortlist is a quality magazine. From gadgets to games to style and news, it’s a fun read. And that’s why women like to read it! From what I’ve seen, it’s not littered with half naked women and ridiculous “new sex ideas” or tricks on how to get your girlfriend to have anal sex with you. (Hello, Maxim. Hello, Men’s Health.)

Danny Wallace’s column is the first thing I read every Thursday, and every Thursday I’m the loon laughing to myself on the train because his columns are always funny. Always entertaining.

And now, in an attempt to smack down Grazia and Heat and all of those other cheap women’s fashion mags, Shortlist Media have created Stylist, you know, for the ladies.

As I very much like Shortlist, I was excited for Stylist. I like fashion and clothes, but I trusted that since this was Shortlist we were talking about, it would be quite meaty.

And then I saw the cover. A close-up of Angelina Jolie’s pouty mouth with the headline:

“Mum’s Home: A peek inside the heart-warming chaos of the Jolie-Pitt household”

Heart-warming chaos?

But, because I really want to like this magazine, I kept going. Despite the cover.

There’s a “Style List” of cool/pretty/expensive things. A nail varnish article next to the headline, “Why are women still earning less than men?” 

Stephanie Phair from theOutNet.co.uk is featured with a “working day in the life of” style diary entry,  which to be honest, was quite boring. 

“Cycling in a pencil skirt is hard!” 

“I used to work for Anna Wintour!” 

I’m sure Phair is lovely, but the article was incredibly dull. Which probably isn’t her fault (a diary of my day would be boring indeed) but the dullness of the article was probably down to the very nature of the feature itself.

Stylist’s answer to Danny Wallace is Dawn Porter, and she's apparently going to dazzle us every week with a highly entertaining column. 

Unfortunately, Dawn’s trip to Bravissimo article also bored me to tears. And I love Dawn. I really love Dawn. Maybe it’s because I’ve already written a similar story or just the fact that it’s a column about a bra, because we’re women, but I can’t help but roll my eyes and turn the page.

From features on skin creams to mascaras, to a “pep-talk” piece on why women are “born to be the boss”, I was just done.

Plus, where is the technology and gadgetry other than in an American Express advert, an ad for the LG BL40, and a 15 word blurb on the Samsung Genio Touch?

I guess what confuses me is that this is supposed to be the female answer to Shortlist. 

And I stupidly thought if you have a successful formula for one publication, and decide to make a “girl version” of it, it has to carry on the same sort of feeling. Stylist does not feel like Shortlist for women. It feels like Grazia and Marie Claire’s free, bastard lovechild.

Stylist doesn’t have the same punch as Shortlist.

Where’s the edge? Where’s the fun?

Reading about Jennifer Aniston in another god damn RomCom and someone else’s biological clock isn’t exactly fun.

So why make a girl version of SHORTLIST if you’re not going to make it fun?

Or was that not the point? Were they aiming to make another fashion magazine for women, but for free?

There are plenty of ways they could have made Stylist more fun, despite it being fashion focused. Throw in some Vivienne Westwood. Give it some Luella quirkiness and even some fucking Peaches Geldof if it will spice it up. It’s not the sexy side of fashion they’ve chosen, they’ve chosen the Vera Wang,  control top white cotton panties side of fashion to embrace.

It seems safe. It seems bland... like an pre-packaged M&S Christmas dinner. It’s posh. It tastes acceptable. But it’s got no soul.

Shortlist has soul. And a personality.

 I’ll stick with that, thank you.

POSTED IN: NEWS
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:59 (GMT+00)
6 Responses
1.

I looked at it online yesterday and it looked booooooooring. I'll try and pick it up on the way home but it really hasn't enticed me. I hate Dawn Porter with a burning passion too, so that puts me off.

rachael gibson
Wed, 07-Oct-2009 12:48 GMT
2.

One of the worst parts of the dear, departed London Paper was the Talk column, because it was full of endless, hideously dull and woefully repetitive 'columns' on such new and exciting topics as how we should all stop using this internet rubbish and really talk to each other (written in a passive medium where they're not actually talking to anyone) *sigh*. Things don't have to be original to be good - or we'd all be in trouble - but they do need to be fresh. It sounds like Stylist is just going to be a rehash of the same old rubbish without even the benefit of a shiny new way of looking at it. Depressing.

Alex
Wed, 07-Oct-2009 12:51 GMT
3.

The worst thing about it for me is that the editors column on the first page talks about "thoughtful journalism dealing with issues that matter" - what, like the fact that women spend more time getting ready for work every day than men do? Deep.

Kate
Wed, 07-Oct-2009 17:03 GMT
4.

Kate - when she said something about indulging in too many "Green & Blacks" I knew I was done.

Cate
Thu, 08-Oct-2009 09:22 GMT
5.

Too fluffy and dull for me. I'll be sticking to Shortlist if the Stylist doesn't get some personality pretty darn quick.

Leah
Thu, 08-Oct-2009 09:46 GMT
6.

I have to admit it... you're right. I wanted to like it, but the mumsiness and the nail varnish article next to the headline, “Why are women still earning less than men?” (that made me wince too!) meant that I was rather underwhelmed. Am still going to pick up a copy next week and see if things have changed, but I won't be looking forward to it the way I look forward to Shortlist.

Lori Smith
Fri, 09-Oct-2009 15:08 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

social feed

@BitchBuzz: The [Digital] Revolution Will Be Gendered - from @katelaity on BitchBuzz Tech http://t.co/5bkxZo0x
09 Feb @ 10:46 GMT

search



buzz we love

Bitchin' Lifestyle
Vikki Chowney
Bangs and a Bun
Vintage Patisserie
Pop Justice
The Other Woman
Pamflet
Gala Darling
Red Velvet
Shape What's to Come
Bird's Eye View
Gala Darling
Bake & Destroy
Kris Atomic
Mark Johns
Garfunkel & Oates
India Knight
Kate Nash
Erin Gibson
Sarah Lacy
Vegansaurus
The Boss of You
Meantime Brewery
Make and Do with Perri