The Implications of Creating Male Birth Control

By Kate Stoddard

There are actually several reasons why women choose to get on “The Pill” beyond birth control. In fact, I knew girls in high school as young as 14 and 15 getting on the Pill to regulate erratic menstrual cycles and to help alleviate episodes of excruciating cramps. Then a couple of years (or even a couple of months) later they received the added benefit of being able to have sex without a condom. What a fabulous life indeed! 

What remains unknown, however, is how many of these girls are still on birth control a decade or more later and feel afraid to what will happen to their bodies when they get off of it. Will their breasts shrink? Will their agonizing menstrual cramps return? Will they get pregnant? Conversely, what will happen to their bodies if they stay on it?

What once opened the door of sexual liberation for women could now be backing many of them into a corner. No one can deny the benefits of condom-less sex when you’re in a long-term relationship with someone. It allows for spontaneity, greater stimulation, not having to deal with wrappers and disposal, and seriously, who enjoys that lingering smell of lube and latex after intimate hours in the boudoir?  So if not condoms, then what? Other than a vasectomy, all other options of birth control require the woman to alter some portion of her body- whether it’s taking hormones, inserting an IUD, using a diaphragm, or getting a shot to name a few. So where’s the pill to help men shoot blanks in the name of contraception? Aren’t we as women doing essentially the same?

Granted, medical research has shown that it’s more difficult to reduce sperm production than it is to prevent a woman from releasing her egg. Men make 1,000 sperm a second (whoa!) while women make one egg a month. Researchers, however, say that it’s very possible, but no one wants to fund research for a product that has no market. Meaning, show me the man who’s going to take a pill or an injection that causes him to lose his sperm potency. Anyone?

The release of “The Pill” in 1960 did precisely this: it gave women more options to be in control of their sex lives. Now that it’s 30 years later, HPV is on the rise, HIV is still a major national concern, and girls are going on the Pill at younger and younger ages. Oral contraception is definitely a good option in many circumstances, but is it always the best? Shouldn’t we now be pushing for more and more options and be involving men in the equation as well?

Many women express concern that they do not trust men to correctly take their pill or injection. After all, it’s not their bodies that have to carry the pregnancy or undergo the abortion. However, this raises the question: why are we having sex with people we don’t really trust? The pill was meant to encourage sexual freedom and responsibility with our bodies; however, if we are having unprotected sex with people whom we don’t rely on to respect our wishes to prevent pregnancy, are we being responsible with our bodies anyway?

 Image via examiner.com

POSTED IN: NEWS
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:06 (GMT+00)
2 Responses
1.

Being a single chica, I would continue to take my birth control if a male contraceptive came on the market. Just for my own peace of mind. However, if I was in a serious, committed relationship and my boyfriend was down to take the pill, I would love it! I have been taking birth control since I was 15 and would love to go off it. I feel as if I don't know my "real" menstrual self and I heard the pill reduces sex drives! So, please get on the market male pill!!!! At least by the time I get a boyfriend .... soooooo, pharmaceutical companies have awhile....

KG
Mon, 26-Jul-2010 22:29 GMT
2.

Excellent article. There are far too many that just descend into male bashing, (ie things like "no man can remember to take out the trash so I'm not going to have him taking the birth control") but your point about having sex with people we don't trust is right on the money. I can't speak for all men, but, assuming it was shown to be safe, I would absolutely take it. As for the reduction in sperm count: that's kind of the whole point. There is nothing especially scary about it.

Sam
Thu, 29-Jul-2010 16:47 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

social feed

@BitchBuzz: The [Digital] Revolution Will Be Gendered - from @katelaity on BitchBuzz Tech http://t.co/5bkxZo0x
09 Feb @ 10:46 GMT

search



buzz we love

Bitchin' Lifestyle
Vikki Chowney
Bangs and a Bun
Vintage Patisserie
Pop Justice
The Other Woman
Pamflet
Gala Darling
Red Velvet
Shape What's to Come
Bird's Eye View
Gala Darling
Bake & Destroy
Kris Atomic
Mark Johns
Garfunkel & Oates
India Knight
Kate Nash
Erin Gibson
Sarah Lacy
Vegansaurus
The Boss of You
Meantime Brewery
Make and Do with Perri