Pepsi Switches to "Healthy" Artificial Ingredients

By Alison Duker

PepsiCo is the latest food conglomerate to commit to a reduction in sugar, salt and saturated fats in its products. The obesity epidemic has resulted in increased Government pressure on companies to take responsibility of their product ingredients and encourage healthier eating. 

According to the Financial Times, it follows suit after US health officials threatened to take action against them and fellow companies Con-Agra, Kraft and Campbell.

PepsiCo, who own brands such as Walkers Crisps and Quaker have pledged to reduce sodium levels by 25% by 2015 and the same amount in sugar and saturated fats by 2020. Funnily enough, the food behemoth will not commit to absolute levels of sugar, salt or fats but will, by 2012, display calorie counts and key nutrients on its packaging. Which we all know are the key drivers stopping people from buying and eating certain foods. Not.

Lets get this straight, using a benchmark of the 2006 levels, which could be more or less than 2010 levels, its going to take them between FIVE and TEN years to reduce the amount of salt, sugar and fats. Five to ten years??!! I’m appalled. It takes a shorter time to build a housing complex. Surely the amount of boffins and machinery they have in their arsenal they could do this a little bit quicker. Excuse me for being cynical, however, this looks like a case of smoke and mirrors. 

They get the brownie points from governments and media exposure for announcing their reductions, thus avoiding any lawsuits, but give such a long timeline that by the time five years comes round everyone has forgotten the pledge in the first place.

But fear not, they do have our best interests at heart. PepsiCo allege they are also going to increase the whole grain, fruit, vegetable, nut, seed and low-fat dairy content in their products. So watch out for a whole raft of new ‘innovations’ including fruit and vegetable crisps (which are, believe it or not, unhealthy), sugar/honey/sweetener soaked muesli bars, again, highly calorific and wheat and soya-based products to help prop up the destructive cereal farming practice in the Americas.

The best bit is yet to come; PepsiCo will switch from using palm oil to vegetable oil and replace sugar with artificial sweeteners. I’m not advocating the use of palm oil by any stretch of the imagination  however; the use of vegetable oil is just trading one nasty for another. 

Vegetable oils are very sensitive to heat, a key part of food processing, which changes their molecular structure radically into what are known as trans-fats. These fats are useless to us and for our health; they increase cholesterol levels, impair cell membrane function, which means we are less able to absorb nutrients and excrete toxins, and are strongly implicated in cancer, heart disease and inflammatory conditions.

Artificial sweeteners, chemicals created to taste like sugar, are also another man-made nightmare. Aspartame, acsulfame-K and saccharine have been linked to a variety of conditions including childhood behavioural issues, cancer, hypoglycaemia, poor mental health. But of course, the artificial sugar industry is huge in the U.S. so any threat to a potential increase in business will be circumvented by any means possible. 

I don’t care how it’s wrapped up, swapping natural for artificial will not solve the issue of obesity; it will create another revenue stream for an already extremely profitable company as they create new ‘improved’ brand extensions. Think about the ‘baked’ crisps that sit alongside the old favourites.

When are governments going to wise-up and realise that this isn’t going to work? They need to invest in education and skill enhancement rather than trying to get a multi-billion industry to self-regulate. Why is everything so hands-off these days? Passing the buck when it is the culmination of years of neglect in the system that has created this status quo. Surely human health is more important that company profit? 

There are some great companies out there who are producing natural processed foods, but they are a minority as fresh food does not have a long shelf-life thus is more potentially to affect the profit-line if stock doesn’t sell. The key hook to processed foods is sugar, be it glucose, fructose, barley-malt syrup or any other form of natural or artificial sweetener; our brain's primary energy source is glucose, so the more we eat, the more we want. Sugar is the biggest addiction of all time. Forget the war on heroin, this is where its at.

I saw this very effective KitKat spoof from Greenpeace, protesting against Nestle’s purchase of palm oil to highlight the destruction of the orang-utan population. I think it’s time that we created something similar for the human race before we eat ourselves to death.

Image via Tiffa130's Flickr

POSTED IN: NEWS
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:00 (GMT+00)
3 Responses
1.

Corporations place profits before people. A 25% reduction in sodium is laughable. The healthy ratio of calories to sodium should be no more than 1:1, e.g., a food that is 200 calories per serving should never have more than 200 mg of sodium.
An average serving of Campbell's soup: 110 calories and 890 mg of sodium! A 25% reduction brings the same serving size to 668 mg of sodium 4OO PERCENT HIGHER THAN EXPERTS RECOMEND, and this is after the healthy reduction! Another example is ConAgra's flagship line Chef Boyardee, their famous Spaghetti and Meatballs is 270 calories per serving and a whooping 900 mg of sodium, and again, after the big 25% reduction it will be 675 mg of sodium, 2 and a half times more sodium than is healthy and way more than the 1 to 1 ratio.

Steve
Tue, 23-Mar-2010 15:32 GMT
2.

I wish I could say any of this surprises me. The biggest concern for me is the amount of sweeteners used. While I'm pregnant I'm pretty relaxed about most food restrictions (watch as I drink my caffeinated tea), but I'm avoiding sweeteners like the plague because of a long history of questions over long term health issues and getting extremely dizzy and sick whenever I drink anything containing aspartame (took me a while to work that one out). If someone who's generally pretty relaxed about these things like me is worried, that's saying something.

Annoyingly, it's now next to impossible to find low-fat fruit yogurts that aren't spiked with sugar AND sweeters. I've taken to getting skimmed Greek yogurt and adding fresh fruit myself.

And Steve, I'm with you. My mother-in-law is Jewish and sometimes uses the Telma kosher chicken soup mix. We've had to ask her to stop, because the primary ingredient ain't chicken, veg, or even water: it's salt.

Alex
Wed, 24-Mar-2010 10:58 GMT
3.

Why are you blaming the company? It's the Americans eating it without thought or care that is the problem. Americans don't want to take responsibility for being FAT. They want to sit on their butt in front of the TV and eat crap all day then blame the food company for making it unhealthy. Well, you know it isn't healthy, so buy something else. If they didn't buy it the company wouldn't make it anymore. Eat that as it was first intended, a once in a while snack/treat. Get off the couch and walk around. Make your own food so you know what is in it.

Of course it is going to take the company 5 years to change the stuff, the are first and formost a COMPANY, they are there to make a profit. They have to find a way to cut the fat/salt and make it tast the same. They have hundreds of recipies they will have to modify and test to make it work. Why is the government trying to police the food company anyway? Don't they have bigger things to worry about?

-how are you going to compare lazy fat people eating too much sugar to HEROIN! Do you really want the government to watch what everyone eats and not give a damn about a deadly drug! YOU need to be responsible for what you eat!

Casey
Wed, 14-Apr-2010 04:03 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

social feed

@BitchBuzz: The [Digital] Revolution Will Be Gendered - from @katelaity on BitchBuzz Tech http://t.co/5bkxZo0x
09 Feb @ 10:46 GMT

search



buzz we love

Bitchin' Lifestyle
Vikki Chowney
Bangs and a Bun
Vintage Patisserie
Pop Justice
The Other Woman
Pamflet
Gala Darling
Red Velvet
Shape What's to Come
Bird's Eye View
Gala Darling
Bake & Destroy
Kris Atomic
Mark Johns
Garfunkel & Oates
India Knight
Kate Nash
Erin Gibson
Sarah Lacy
Vegansaurus
The Boss of You
Meantime Brewery
Make and Do with Perri