M&S Want £2 More For Your Double Ds

By Cate Sevilla

Apparently a group of ample chested ladies are going to storm the next Marks & Spencer annual meeting as the chain store is charging more for bigger bras.

The ever-reliable Daily Mail reports that M&S have pissed off a huge number of women by charging £2 for bras bigger than a DD cup as they "require more engineering and materials." The Busts 4 Justice Facebook group (of course there's a Facebook group) has over 8,000 members and declare:

"M&S argued that bigger bras have bigger overheads and so must retail at a bigger price. Note here that other high-street lingerie retailers don't feel this need to distinguish between these 'costs' and operate a one price for all tariff.

"Nor do M&S apply the same policy to their other items. They would never charge you more for an extra large t-shirt, or less for a smaller pair of trousers."

Beckie Williams, the cofounder of Busts 4 Justice, explains that M&S's claims of needing to up the price on bigger cup sizes because of the extra materials is bollocks, as she says there is the same amount of fabric used on a D cup with a 38 inch back as a DD with a 30 inch back.

And excitingly, unlike other Facebook groups, this group is actually taking action as they've purchased shares in M&S and have warned the retailer that they will take their campaign as shareholders to the AGM in July. This might actually get something done as Williams says, "They haven't listened to us as customers, so now maybe they'll have to listen to us as shareholders."

However, Marks & Spencer claim that women say they'll "happily" pay the surcharge of £1.50 - £2. They claim that the extra materials and engineering that goes into bigger bras as to ensure the breast tissue is "properly supported and protected", and really, isn't that worth the £2, ladies?

Um, no, and here's why:

Marks & Spencer should always be using engineering and materials that will ensure all of their bras, even the A cups, are properly designed so that a woman's breast tissue is properly supported and protected.

This shouldn't be a fancy new feature that a bra actually fucking does what it's meant to.

Just as importantly, M&S should be making sure that their customers are wearing the RIGHT size bra. I know more women who have gone to M&S and told they were a 38C when they were actually a 32DD than any other store. 

I'd gladly pay an extra £2 to make sure I was wearing the right size - but not as a penalty for having more breast tissue.

Busts 4 Justice make the excellent point that other high street shops and retailers do not charge extra for larger cup sizes. Take La Senza for example, whose marketing director, Lisa Bond, says that: "We don't believe that you should discriminate against women because of the size of their chest."

And really, how can M&S actually believe it's OK to do so?

POSTED IN: NEWS
Wed, 06 May 2009 10:22 (GMT+00)
2 Responses
1.

This might even be vaguely acceptable if their bigger bras were even a good fit! I have one in a size larger than a DD, and it does absolutely nothing for me. The cups cover the boobs alright, but even at their tightest the straps are so long and made of such flimsy fabric that it offers pretty much no support whatsoever.

M&S can defs piss off with charging more for a bra that probably won't do anything for you. My advice is to use the extra money wisely and go for a brand like Freya.

Laura
Wed, 06-May-2009 10:34 GMT
2.

Yep - went in to M&S wearing a 38D. I'd lost some weight and it was riding up at the back. Was told I was a 42B. Gamely tried on the bra and my boobs fell out the bottom it was so big.

Went to Bravissimo. Fitted for a 36DD. Have bra that actually fits.

If they want to charge on a sliding scale for the material costs of everything, at least that would be honest - I'm a size 14, I can understand paying more than an 8 would for a pair of trousers that have legs twice the width (even though I think it's all a bit silly). But saying it's okay to discriminate against one body part and not another is just plain bizarre. And as Cate very rightly says, they should be turning out perfect, supportive engineering even for those who have a smaller bust.

Alex
Wed, 06-May-2009 10:42 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

social feed

@BitchBuzz: The [Digital] Revolution Will Be Gendered - from @katelaity on BitchBuzz Tech http://t.co/5bkxZo0x
09 Feb @ 10:46 GMT

search



buzz we love

Bitchin' Lifestyle
Vikki Chowney
Bangs and a Bun
Vintage Patisserie
Pop Justice
The Other Woman
Pamflet
Gala Darling
Red Velvet
Shape What's to Come
Bird's Eye View
Gala Darling
Bake & Destroy
Kris Atomic
Mark Johns
Garfunkel & Oates
India Knight
Kate Nash
Erin Gibson
Sarah Lacy
Vegansaurus
The Boss of You
Meantime Brewery
Make and Do with Perri