Liz Jones Almost Made a Good Point about Emma Watson

By Rebecca Thomson

I am not accustomed to agreeing with Liz Jones. Her writing is definitely typical of Daily Mail writers in that it seems designed to provoke and offend, and aside from that, she just seems slightly insane.

This weekend though, she wrote an article containing something which almost resembled a good point. It was also deeply offensive, but this is Liz Jones - you’re supposed to get annoyed. Her basic argument was (I think) that the honour killings we hear so much about in countries like Turkey are similar in some ways to the way Western countries perceive and treat women. We celebrate and are obsessed with purity, and we punish those who aren’t young, virginal and beautiful.

I *do not* agree with her logic that burying your teenage daughter alive because she spoke to boys on the phone is somehow the same as 19-year-old Emma Watson earning more than Meryl Streep. Her article does make that link, which is slightly sickening – the two things are in completely different leagues. And in analysing the treatment of women in Iran and Pakistan she’s claiming to be an authority on something she must know next to nothing about.

But while the battle for equality is in no way as desperate in the UK or the US as it is in some parts of the world, I do agree that it shouldn’t make us complacent about our own faults. The teenage Watson was the highest female earner in Hollywood last year. She’s one of only two women on the list of the year’s biggest earners, and the rest are older, powerful male directors. However you look at it, this is a symptom of a society obsessed with female beauty, youth and powerlessness.

I dislike Jones’ trivialising of suffering elsewhere in the world, but somewhere in the muddle of terrible judgement and bad logic, she has a point. It’s not an original one, but it’s certainly unusual to see it in the Daily Mail

Plus, in writing about horrific recent cases of abuse of women, she’s raising awareness of it in a paper not exactly renowned for its strong stance on women’s rights. She might be overpaid and full of crap, but even Liz Jones has a point sometimes.

POSTED IN: NEWS
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:01 (GMT+00)
3 Responses
1.

Emma Watson's male co-stars Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe also appear in the top earners list. So Emma's success is not due to "an obsession with female beauty, youth and powerlessness" - it is due to her role in an incredibly successful franchise that happens to focus on young people.

In comparison, Meryl Streep's roles in 2009 were confined to Doubt, Juliet & Julia, and some voice acting in Fantastic Mr Fox - the latter two films released towards the end of the year.

It might upset the Daily Mail that a young actress earns more than an older one, but age and gender have no bearing here. Rebecca, I'm disappointed that you have given any credence to this deliberate confusion of separate issues.

JD
Tue, 09-Feb-2010 11:59 GMT
2.

She's been in successful films yes, and her male co-stars are on the list too. Although I'd add that a lot of her income comes from the lucrative advertising contracts she gets - and she gets these because young women sell stuff better than old women.

It also doesn't change the fact that there were only two women on the list, and that there are no high earning, older, powerful female directors up there. I'm not just talking about Emma Watson, but the bigger picture.

Incidentally I didn't give any credence to the confusion of separate issues. I said I didn't agree with that - I agreed with one part of one of the issues.

Rebecca
Tue, 09-Feb-2010 13:30 GMT
3.

I too believe that the U.S is a country of hypocrital behavior. Women of a certain age are called "cougars" and a woman over 35 wearing youthful clothes is put down. A male dominated society has placed so many negatives on any female not in her 20's. It's disgusting. Women are perceived to be old and not sexy after 35. If that were not true then there would be no need to see the "lists" of sexy women over______(fill in the blank). As for being pure and virtuous. American media downs that concepts too. The "bad" girls are always better than the "good" girls. The country is basically going to hell in a basket and the country dances while it burns..

Jada
Mon, 31-Jan-2011 21:52 GMT

Add Comment

Note: Your email address will be verified but will never be published on the site.

If you are a registered user, please Sign In.




The opinions expressed by the author and commenters are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BitchBuzz or any employer or organisation. The aforementioned are not responsible for the accuracy of content published.

social feed

@BitchBuzz: The [Digital] Revolution Will Be Gendered - from @katelaity on BitchBuzz Tech http://t.co/5bkxZo0x
09 Feb @ 10:46 GMT

search



buzz we love

Bitchin' Lifestyle
Vikki Chowney
Bangs and a Bun
Vintage Patisserie
Pop Justice
The Other Woman
Pamflet
Gala Darling
Red Velvet
Shape What's to Come
Bird's Eye View
Gala Darling
Bake & Destroy
Kris Atomic
Mark Johns
Garfunkel & Oates
India Knight
Kate Nash
Erin Gibson
Sarah Lacy
Vegansaurus
The Boss of You
Meantime Brewery
Make and Do with Perri